The Measure of Staff Performance : What Really Works
How do you measure the performance of your staff? Does this measurement lead to better employee performance and hence better business performance? The answer is often not really. A recent article by Stacey Barr (Weekend Australian, 10-11 June 2017) has lead me to explore this further.
Typically, key performance indicators (KPI's) are used in many businesses as a measure of employee performance. They are seen as a tangible indicator of measuring an employee's ongoing work execution and achievement. This is the view from the employer's side of the table, so to speak. However, employees see KPI's as something totally different. As long as they meet their KPI's they are 'safe'. As Stacey discusses, 'the focus is not on doing the best job they can do but on self preservation'. Meeting those targets at the end of the month are the priority. Many times, figures and data are manipulated so that the KPI's are met, ensuring ongoing employment and in many cases end of month bonuses, but is this the best way forward for the business? Dina Gray states in Measurement Madness, "people focus on the measure at the expense of the real objectives of the organisation".
If you want your staff to focus on collaboration, creativity and innovation as key objectives and drivers of the business, then the measures of accountability need to redefined. There needs to be a rethink of the relationship between the employees and the measures utilised and what their accountability looks like. Staff need to measured in such a way that it drives the business directives to improve business performance rather than having staff hiding problems to avoid a blaming culture where the only motivation is one of self preservation.
Accountability needs to focus on the results of the overall performance of the staff within a framework of monitoring, interpreting and improving the results. This drives a mindset of problem solving rather than blame and judgement. Collaboration is key. By giving the team ownership, a culture of working together will drive better initiatives and ongoing improvements in their performance. There will be no need to 'hide' problems when the team are working together and self monitoring their progress. If there is a problem then it is up to them to work through it and come up with a solution. They will have the drive to do well and strive for improvements without keeping their eye on the KPI 'target' as a demotivator.
It might mean that managers need to rethink their management practices to adjust their mindset when it comes to making their teams 'accountable'. Rather than promoting a culture of self preservation, a culture of ownership and collaboration will improve performance, and transparency rather than concealment will be the accountability filter.
Human capital and innovation are the source of all long term economic success





No one person has all the answers. A collective of ideas will always have a better chance of success





